Archive for the ‘know the lies’ Category

When Sheriff Joe Arpaio‘s Cold Case
Posse released its findings and announced that there is “probable
cause” to believe that the “birth certificate” released by Team Obama in
April is a “computer generated forgery,” the liberal media yawned, but allegations are now surfacing that at least one person in the White House, namely First Lady Michelle Obama, is frantic and in a berserk frenzy over the Cold Case Posse’s findings.
According to a report released by the supermarket tabloid, The Globe, Michele Obama “went berserk when she learned the results of the investigation.” According to an inside source: “Michelle stormed into the Oval Office and blasted” Obama for not knocking down the scandal long ago.
The report goes on to state that while she is furious with Arpaio, she is “even more burned up at Barack”
and the incident has “thrown their marriage into chaos.” Of course,
insiders have long speculated that the marriage has been in chaos for
quite some time.
As reported back in December, allegations also surfaced that Michelle Obama is having a secret affair with an unnamed Secret Ser…; and accusations by Larry Sinclair that he smoked crack cocaine and had an affair with …, some years back, refuse to go away.
Understandably, the media does not typically report on
unsubstantiated claims from anonymous sources, but that standard has
become fuzzy as of late. We all remember the media feeding frenzy over
unsubstantiated allegations against businessman Herman Cain, which literally sank his candidacy, and the reluctance of the media to report any credible claims that bolstered the contention that Ca… of the unsubstantiated charges. Why is the liberal media refusing to even investigate these claims?
Where is Sean Hannity and
Bill O’Reilly and the rest of the conservative media? Such inconsistent
standards of reporting leave the question open: will the media pursue,
or even bother to investigate what should be the story of the century?
Unsubstantiated claims are one thing. Cold hard evidence is another
and it should go without saying that the findings of the Cold Case Posse
should be a game changer. A legitimate and duly constituted law enforcement investigation, that…
and that the man who is presently occupying the Oval Office is
potentially occupying that office as a result of fraud and forgery.
While the liberal media is doing everything in its power to ignore
the findings of Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse, Obama can’t ignore the
findings; and if Mike Zullo, the lead investigator for Sheriff Joe
Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse, is correct, not only is Team Obama not
ignoring the findings, but the media’s see-no-evil attitude may not
simply be the result of liberal bias.
Zullo just released another huge bombshell: “During our
investigation, we actually were told [that media] had been threatened
with FTC investigations.
Commentators [had been] threatened with their jobs” and the “threats
were so intimidating that some individuals quit their positions over
safety concerns for their families.
” Author Jerome Corsi added
more fuel to this growing fire when he recently stated: “Testimony is
being developed that the White House is intimidating, in a systematic
way, the mainstream media and if any broadcasters dare go into this
birther story, they’re going to risk FCC investigations… people are
going to have careers ruined… thrown off the air.”
Obviously, there is more going on than meets the eye and hopefully,
more information will be forthcoming. Corsi claims that the evidence
that the Cold Case Posse presented at the press conference was just
“the tip of the iceberg” and he adds:
“There are very deep and important revelations that are being
worked on and they are systematically coming out in the next few weeks.”
Once again, we are left to ask, where is the liberal media? Why is the
reporting on such shocking allegations only coming from the supermarket
tabloids?
Why is Obama not being properly vetted and will the media eventually
catch up to the tabloids and investigate these pile of stories that
could sink the Obama presidency? Only time will tell… Developing.
Birth Certificate Findings
ACN Staff – March 20, 2012 – posted at BeforeIt’sNews
digg
muti
del.icio.us
google
reddit
facebook
Article source: http://www.knowthelies.com/node/7193
Bettina Viviano, Executive Producer of Adam Sandler’s ‘Jack and Jill‘
Movie… Bill Clinton directly told me ‘Obama is not eligible to be president… 2008 and 2012 Election Fraud… Bill Ayers… Gloria Allred…
Black Panthers and Acorn ~ Listen to FULL Audio – related articles
Uploaded by BirtherReportDotCom on Mar 20, 2012
Politijim has an extensive article based on the interview with Bettina Viviano titled: Did Obama Assassinate Clinton Delegates?
17:00 – 1st Portion with Bettina Viviano. How she came to become involved, overview of all complaints.
20:39 – Accuses Pelosi, Dean, Reid of committing the fraud
21:00 – California withheld vote because they were going to stand for Hillary despite railroading
22:00 – Claims Democrats would drive through skid row and pay
them to vote with liquor and booze as well as getting Alzheimer’s
patients to vote.
23:30 – Has seen the New Black Panther party HQ in Houston to plan to steal election.
53:00 – Women from Trinity United Church who knows Obama well, witnessed intimidation similar to Philadelphia Black Panther incident.
55:30 – Bettina’s partner may be intimidated by threats.
56:45 – 21 year old Black Delegated Threatened With Murder
57:15 – Obama campaigns for Islamist, Terrorist Cousin in Kenya (Odinga)
1:00:15 – The ORIGINAL BIRTHERS were Bill Hillary Clinton. Bettina heard it DIRECTLY out of their mouths.
1:01:42 – She has personal knowledge Hillary made a deal the
night before she stepped down. Her friends said the Obama and Clinton
camps were yelling and screaming at each other for 3 days in the ugliest
exhibition of politics they’d ever seen.
1:02:00 – She claims it was widely known at the time that John McCain was not qualified as a natural born citizen either. Link
1:04:00 – From a top Democrat Party leader: George Soros had
meetings with both Barack and Hillary telling them his agenda was to
tear this country to the ground. Obama reportedly said “no problem.”
1:12:24 – She was at the caucus for Rick Perry in Iowa and at one, 99% of the votes were for Ron Paul and they were all Democrats.
1:43:15 – She “knows for a fact” they threatened to kill Bill Clinton and did kill his friend, Bill Gwaltney.
1:44:30 – I heard it out of Bill Clinton’s mouth that Obama wasn’t legitimate.
LISTEN TO
FULL AUDIO OF RED, WHITE AND BLUE SHOW HERE
March 21, 2012 – Posted at BeforeIt’sNews
www.politijim.com/2012/03/did-obama-assassinate-clinton-delegates.html
digg
muti
del.icio.us
google
reddit
facebook
Article source: http://www.knowthelies.com/node/7194

“State System for Civil (public) Protection Mega Simulation”

“State System for Civil (public) Protection
Mega Simulation
Setting: Presence and effect of an earthquake of 7.9 on the Richter Scale.
Participants:
General Public, Schools and Hospitals, both public and private,
businesses, social and private agencies, as well as those dependents of
the three levels of government.
The simulation with take place at 12 hrs
In School or at Work
Before – Be aware of the evacuation route and the reunion point established by your institution.
During – At 12 hrs suspend your activities and follow the evacuation route to the point of reunion, where you must remain until 1:00pm
After – Report your participation, results, and observations to the numbers: (list the numbers)
“Pas the Voice”
They are facts, not words”
Uploaded by dutchsinse on Mar 20, 2012
~~~~~
his is profound and disturbing. There was a verified “drill” planned
for March 20, 2012 in Mexico for a 7.9M earthquake “simulation”…. also
on a separate note.. Barack Obama’s daughter was at the epicenter on
spring break: WTH is going on?!
We need answers.. and I don’t
think (at this point) any of us are going to settle for “coincidence”.
Who has the weapon, and why are they using it.. that is the question at
this point.
link to the documents in question, and links to the stories relating:
http://sincedutch.wordpress.com/2012/03/21/3202012-alert-mexico-7-9m-earthqua…
Uploaded by dutchsinse on Mar 20, 2012
~~~~~
How To Create An Earthquake
Uploaded by NZtrillion on Jan 22, 2010
Reposted March 21, 2012 – KnowTheLies
digg
muti
del.icio.us
google
reddit
facebook
Article source: http://www.knowthelies.com/node/7195

Americans have been led to believe otherwise, revelation to change the political landscape… Obama will be forced by circumstances to apologise. ~ See Documents and related article
Now it is here and places the president in the African continent!
The debate surrounding it will now end after the revelation, and those
who have not been telling the truth will have to be made answerable one
way or another.
The revelation, however, coming during this election year 2012 is doing no good to the democratic party.
API on Tuesday the 6th March evening received President Obama’s
genuine birth certificate. API decided not to hurry in publishing it
immediately because we wanted to be sure of the content value.
Now that the scrutiny has been done, the publishing of the Birth
certificate that will clear the air once and for all is being done
without prejudice. This may force the US president to apologise to the
American people for having been kept in the dark on the issue for a long
time now on demanding the publishing of the birth certificate by
President Obama.

www.africanpress.me Coast province? Check it out
API will scan in here a letter from Coast
Provincial Birth Registration Office in the next few hours or days,
depending on how quick API is cleared to do so.
The purpose of scanning the official letter is to ensure that what we
have received as you see here is fully collaborated officially.

www.africanpress.me
: Obama registration Sir Edward of Lavender was the Colonial Registrar
in Mombasa in 1961? Check it out and satisfy yourself by weighing the
facts individually.
Everyone knows that the documents are very sensitive and are not for misuse by any person to gain upper hand in political games.
It is, however, fair that the whole truth is brought to light and have the whole saga put to rest once and for all.
Many people seem to be of the opinion that there is a plan to hide
from them the real thing. The US President says he is born in Hawaii.
Many documents being circulated worldwide says otherwise. Therefore, it
is very important to be outright and get the real thing on the table
without witch hunt or without trying to malign the president’s name,
unless the truth is not what he personally has said.
A duly signed official letter and a very special
document will be scanned here for all to see – this comes in a few hours
or days, depending on how quick API gets the clearance to do so. The
two documents will put the issue to rest and clear the air once and for
all who wish to know the true facts of this case file that has bothered a
section of the American people!
It is only reasonable to continue working on this case in order to reveal the truth of the matter.
Another issue important to consider is why many are so interested in
this. If Obama has ruled now for three good years and is now in his
fourth year – and already asking for another term that will give him new
4 years in the White House, is there any wrongdoing when he actually
has delivered leadership and continues to do so? He has not run down the
country, so what is all the farce about where he is born? After all, he
has lived in the US all his life.
March 9, 2012 – AfricanPressInternational
Related article…
REVEALED: President Obama is a Lucky Man – The Kenyan Born Ruler of the American People
digg
muti
del.icio.us
google
reddit
facebook
Article source: http://www.knowthelies.com/node/7192

Gas
prices continue to rise, which is finally giving Republicans an issue.
Mitt Romney is demanding the President open up more domestic drilling;
the super PAC behind Rick Santorum just released a new ad in Louisiana
blasting the President on gas prices; and the GOP is attacking the White
House on the Keystone XL Pipeline. ~ Robert Reich – See MyTwoCents and related articles
The rise in gas prices has almost nothing to
do with energy policy. It has everything to do with America’s continuing
failure to adequately regulate Wall Street. Don’t hold your breath
waiting for Republicans to tell the truth.
As I’ve noted before, oil supplies aren’t being
squeezed. Over 80 percent of America’s energy needs are now being
satisfied by domestic supplies. In fact, we’re starting to become an
energy exporter.
Demand for oil isn’t rising in any event. Demand is
down in the U.S. compared to last year at this time, and global demand
is still moderate given the economic slowdowns in Europe and China.
Wall Street is betting on higher oil prices
in the future — and that betting is causing prices to rise. The Street
is laying odds that unrest in Syria will spill over into other countries
or that tensions with Iran will affect the Persian Gulf, and that
global demand will pick up as American consumers bounce back to life.
These bets are pushing up oil prices because Wall
Street firms and other big financial players now dominate oil trading.
Financial speculators historically accounted for
about 30 percent of oil contracts, producers and end users for about 70
percent. Today speculators account for 64 percent of all contracts.
Bart Chilton, a commissioner at the Commodity
Futures Trading Commission — the federal agency that regulates trading
in oil futures, among other commodities — warns that too few financial
players control too much of the oil market.
This allows them to push oil
prices higher and higher — not only on the basis of their expectations
about the future but also expectations about how high other speculators
will drive the price.
In other words, a relatively few players with
very deep pockets are placing huge bets on oil — and you’re paying.
Chilton estimates that drivers of small cars like
Honda Civics are paying an extra $7.30 every time they fill up — and
that money is going into the pockets of Wall Street speculators. Drivers
of larger vehicles like the Ford Explorer are paying speculators $10.41
when they fill up.
Funny, but I don’t hear Republicans rail against
Wall Street speculators. Could this have anything to do with the fact
that hedge funds and money managers are bankrolling the GOP as never
before?
Wall Street isn’t bankrolling Democrats nearly as
much this time around because the Street is still smarting from the
Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform law pushed by the Democrats, and from the
president’s offhand remark in 2010 calling the denizens of the Street
“fat cats.”
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission is
trying to limit how much speculators can bet in oil futures — a power it
was given by Dodd-Frank. It issued a rule in October, but it won’t take
effect for another year.
Meanwhile, Wall Street has gone to court to stop the rule. It’s already won a stay.
As rising gas prices start wagging the
election-year dog, the President should let America know what’s really
causing prices to rise.
Robert Reich – March 16, 2012 – InformationClearingHouse
~~~~~
There is no shortage of oil… if there were our military would be
home protecting our country… Obama and staff would be rowing boats across the ocean to bother
people, and travelling everywhere else by bicycle or horse… Michelle and
‘attendents’ would be vacationing by donkey and cart. I don’t see this
happening.
Thanks for reading…
SadInAmerica
Check out these related articles…
Biggest gas and oil comsumers in the world…
America’s top export in 2011 was . . . fuel? – The Washington Post
Gas, other fuels are top U.S. export – USATODAY.com
Top U.S. Export for 2011 Was Fuel; U.S. Gas Prices at Record High …
Keystone XL is a tar sands pipeline to export oil out of the United …
The above is just an small example…
There is NO shortage of oil, never has been, never will be.
Expose The Fraud: There Is Absolutely NO Oil Shortage!
Obama’s Oil Crisis and Americans’ Pain at the Pump | Christian …
Oil Shortage Is A Lie So the Elitist Can Fulfill Their Plans – YouTube
Who uses the most oil in the world?
How Much Energy Does the U.S. Military Consume | The Daily …
The US military oil consumption | Energy Bulletin
What about Obama flitting around the world bothering people?
Obama Owes The IRS $35 Million for His Jet – Forbes
Barry Obama burns $80K in jet fuel to downplay gasoline prices …
Then there’s Michelle and the family undeserved vacations…
Michelle Obama jets off to Aspen for ski weekend
President Obama to jet off to Hawaii for SEVENTEEN-DAY …
Michelle Obama’s Africa Trip Cost More Than $424142 …
It’s a scam! The whole oil thing is a massive money making scam!
Now you know… ~ SadInAmerica
digg
muti
del.icio.us
google
reddit
facebook
Article source: http://www.knowthelies.com/node/7187

Small business owners and working people
constitute the core of the American electorate. They share the same
origins and have far more in common than the major political parties
would have them believe. Their shared political, social and family needs
are being ignored by both parties, as they are cynically played one
against the other. ~ William Cox
A Common Background.
Organizations
of craftsmen have an ancient origin and evolved into hundreds of
specialized guilds in the Middle Ages. These guilds combined labor and
small business. Members worked for themselves and trained their own
apprentice helpers.
Along with independent farmers and local
merchants, skilled craftsmen were the primary employers until the
industrial revolution. Industrialization created the need for masses of
unskilled workers and the conditions which ultimately compelled their organization.
Success
of the earliest industrial strikes depended on local small business
owners, who provided the necessary credit and support that allowed
workers and their families to survive.
American small businesses
and laborers have organized for self protection from the very beginning
of the country. The bakery owners of New York City stopped baking in
1741 to protest price fixing by municipal authorities and printers
struck in Philadelphia in 1786 for higher wages.
The Progressive
Movement in the early 1900s was supported by labor, small businesses,
the professional middle class and women activists. They sought to reform
every aspect of the political system allowing voters to more directly
control their government and to improve the quality of life for their
families.
The Division of Labor
A strong labor
movement expanded during World War II and the postwar era to reach its
peak in 1972, with the organization of almost one third of all public
and private workers. These union members were the ground troops of the
Democratic Party.
With the comfort and security of higher
earnings and benefits, skilled workers moved up to the middle class and
many of them and their children started small businesses. At the same
time, President Reagan’s war on organized labor began to cut the ties
that workers had to their unions.
These factors, combined with
Republican cooption of “family values” and religious matters as
political issues, has resulted in only about 11% of workers, primarily
in the public sector, now represented by unions. Almost 50% of all
workers are voting for Republican candidates, often against their own
interests.
Small Businesses and Their Workers.
Half
of all working people in the United States either operate a small
business or work in one. Small businesses represent 99.7% of all U.S.
private employers and have, since 1989, created 93.5% of all net new
jobs in the country. (National Small Business Association)
Almost
three quarters of all U.S. business firms have no payroll. In other
words, most are operated by self-employed persons, who may or may not
have other sources of income. Of the almost six million firms with
employees, 78% employ fewer than 10. (U.S. Census Bureau)
Given
these realities, there is very little effective contact between small
business owners and labor unions; however, there is a very high degree
of shared interests between most small business owners and workers in
America.
Suffering.
Small business owners and
workers share the anxiety of economic uncertainty, including the
difficulty or impossibility of obtaining health insurance, saving for
retirement and providing education, food and shelter for their families.
Small
business employers and their employees travel to work over the same
unrepaired roads, and they send their children to the same rundown
schools that suffer from a lack of teachers, funding and direction.
Their homes have negative value, they live in the same environment,
drink the same polluted water and breath the same poisonous air. Their
food supply is dangerous, and they all pay more than $4 a gallon for
gasoline.
Failure of Representation.
Whether they
vote democratic or republican, the interests, aspirations and needs of
workers and small business owners are ignored by their political
parties, both of which are indebted to and controlled by large
corporations and the wealthy elite.
With its decision in Citizens United,
the Supreme Court reversed two hundred years of progress toward a
democracy for all of the People. The U.S. Government no longer
represents the voters who elect it, including the workers and small
business owners of every political party.
Two thirds of small business owners revealed in a recent poll that they have been hurt by Citizens United, and 88% viewed money as playing a negative role in politics. (Lake Research)
The
rallying cry last heard during the American Revolution, “no taxation
without representation,” is once again on the lips of American workers
and small business owners.
Solution.
The bipartisan outrage over the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United
has led to a number of proposals to reverse it through an amendment to
the U.S. Constitution. The best known of these is the effort by Move to
Amend, which restricts constitutional rights to natural persons only and
which disallows the equation of money and free speech.
The Move
to Amend proposal is a good start; however it does not go far enough. In
fact, after a long and difficult amendment process, it only returns the
electoral process to where it was the day before the court decision, a
time when things were not so great for working people and small business
owners.
The Voters’ Rights Amendment (USVRA) includes the Move
to Amend proposal, but goes further to clearly establish that the right
to cast an effective vote is an inherent right under the
Constitution. In addition, it provides for a national paid voting
holiday, a national hand-countable paper ballot, and a process for the
people to have a more direct role in the formulation of public policy.
Finally, it mandates voter registration and prohibits voter suppression.
Transformation.
The USVRA will transform the
U.S. government into a more representative democracy in which the power
of money and corporations will be curtailed – one in which the
opportunity for small business owners and their workers to live the
American Dream will be encouraged, rather than denied.
William Cox – March 19, 2012 – GlobalResearch.ca
William John Cox is
a retired prosecutor and public interest lawyer, author and political
activist. His efforts to promote a peaceful political evolution can be
found at VotersEvolt.com and USVRA.us. His writings are collected at WilliamJohnCox.com and he can be contacted at u2cox@msn.com.
digg
muti
del.icio.us
google
reddit
facebook
Article source: http://www.knowthelies.com/node/7188

Congressional
Democrats, the media and civil libertarians are continuing their fight
with President Barack Obama over his administration’s secret
interpretations of the Patriot Act. ~ Noel Brinkerhoff ~ related article
Senators Ron Wyden of Oregon and Mark Udall of Colorado, who sit on the Senate Intelligence Committee, wrote to Attorney General Eric Holder
last week claiming a classified intelligence operation based on the
Patriot Act interpretation is not as critical to national security as
the administration says.
Wyden and Udall also wrote that Americans would be “stunned” if
they knew what the government was really doing based on the legal theory
being employed through the Patriot Act.
In October, Sen. Richard Durbin
(D-Illinois) said that the government’s use of “Section 215 is
unfortunately cloaked in secrecy. Some day that cloak will be lifted,
and future generations will ask whether our actions today meet the test
of a democratic society: transparency, accountability, and fidelity to
the rule of law and our Constitution.”
The Department of Justice
has insisted that revealing anything about the secret spy program could
“cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security of the
United States.”
Federal lawyers are trying to dismiss two lawsuits, one by The New York Times and
the other by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic
Frontier Foundation, that seek to force the administration into
disclosing how the Patriot Act has been interpreted.
Noel Brinkerhoff – March 20, 2012 – AllGov
Related article…
What is Obama Keeping Secret about the Patriot Act?
digg
muti
del.icio.us
google
reddit
facebook
Article source: http://www.knowthelies.com/node/7189

Did the parents of former Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers help finance Barack Obama’s Harvard education?… Did Ayers’ mother believe Obama was a foreign student?… Was the young Obama convinced at the time – long before he even
entered politics – that he was going to become president of the United
States? ~ Jerome Corsi
A retired U.S. Postal Service carrier who delivered mail to Tom and Mary
Ayers in a Chicago suburb in the late 1980s and early 1990s and claims
to have met Obama in front of the Ayers home emphatically says yes to
all three questions.
Allen Hulton, who was commended for 39 years of honorable service with
the USPS, has given a sworn affidavit to investigators commissioned by
Maricopa County, Ariz., Sheriff Joe Arpaio to determine whether Obama is
eligible for Arizona’s 2012 election ballot. Hulton has recorded about
three hours of video interviews with WND.
Hulton says that in conversations with Mary Ayers while on his route he
learned of the couple’s enthusiasm and support for a black foreign
student. One bright, warm Chicagoland day, he recounts, he met the
student who fit Mary Ayers’ description in front of the Ayers home in
Glen Ellyn, Ill. That young man, Hulton is convinced, was Barack Obama.
Hulton delivered mail to the Ayers, who are both deceased, when he was
stationed at the post office in Glen Ellyn, an upper-middle class suburb
25 miles west of downtown Chicago, from late 1986 to 1997. He was a
USPS employee from March 28, 1962, through March 30, 2001.
(Editor’s
note: Although the Ayers family no longer lives there, WND is
withholding the Glen Ellyn street address for the sake of the current
residents’ privacy.)
“It was a beautiful neighborhood – one of the nicer routes any of the
letter carriers would have liked to have had,” Hulton recalls. “It had
some large and very beautiful homes.”
As WND reported yesterday, Obama’s relationship with Bill Ayers – whom
he dismissed in a 2008 debate as “just a guy who lives in my
neighborhood” – plagued him in the 2008 presidential campaign and could
resurface in this year’s election, as many questions remain.
Young Obama
Over a period of years in the late 1980s and early 1990s, Hulton
estimates he spoke with Mary Ayers about 18 to 20 times and once to Tom
Ayers, who died in 2007. Mary Ayers died in 2000.
“Sometimes Mary would be out when I delivered the mail, and we would
exchange a few words on occasion,” he says, recalling that she liked to
talk about her family.
“One day, Mary came to the door when I came up to the house with the
mail,” he remembers. “After a greeting, she started enthusiastically
talking to me about this young black student they were helping out, and
she referred to him as a foreign student.”
Hulton assumed that by “helping” the student, Mary Ayers meant she and
her husband were financially supporting the black foreign-exchange
student with his education.
He says that Mary Ayers told him the student’s name, but that it was a
“strange name” that he could not remember, even though at the time it
sounded African to him.
“I was taken aback by how enthusiastic she was about him,” Hulton says.
“And I believe she said he was from either Kenya or Indonesia, and I
favor Indonesia in my recollection.”
WND has reported that when Obama was in Indonesia with his Indonesian
stepfather and his mother from ages 6 to10, he was registered in school
as an Indonesian citizen and a Muslim. He went by the name Barry
Soetoro, adopting the surname of his Indonesian stepfather. His mother’s
passport listed him with the surname Soebarkah.
Obama refuses to waive privacy rights that would allow the Hawaii
Department of Health to release any adoption records that may exist for
him.
Even should Obama waive privacy rights, the Hawaii Department of Health
might not feel compelled to release any adoption records that may exist.
Tight restrictions to vital records have been enacted by the Hawaii
State Legislature to seal any public documents pertaining to Obama’s
birth records and his adoption status.
If Obama were adopted by his Indonesian stepfather, he may have
compromised his eligibility to be president, according to Article 2,
Section 1 of the Constitution, which requires that a president be a
“natural-born citizen,” which experts say means having both parents be
U.S. citizens.
‘I’m going to be president of the United States’
About a year after discussing with Mary Ayers the foreign student she
and her husband were supporting, Hulton recalls meeting a young black
male on the sidewalk in front of the Ayers home.
Hulton describes the man as being in his early 20s, noting that he was
tall, thin, had a light complexion and that his ears stuck out.
“He greeted me,” Hulton says. “He was very polite, dressed nicely, but
informally – slacks and a dress shirt – and he spoke with no accent.
Immediately this young black man entered into conversation with me. He
told me he had taken the train out from Chicago and had come to thank
the Ayers family personally for having helped him with his education.”
Hulton remembers asking the young man what his plans were for the future.
“He looked right at me and told me he was going to be president of the United States,” Hulton says.
“There was a little bit of a grin on his face when he said it – he
sounded sure of himself, but not arrogant. I know how people will say
things because they have an ambition, but it did not come across that
way,” Hulton says. “It came across as if this young black male was
telling me he was going to be president, almost as if it were the
statement of a scientific fact that had already been determined, as if
his being president had been already pre-arranged.”
Hulton says the claim made him speechless.
“I kind of stuttered a response and said that nowadays anything is possible. I wished him good luck with his ambition,” he says.
Immediately, Hulton associated the young black man with the foreign
student Mary Ayers had mentioned to him so enthusiastically about a year
earlier.
“I remembered the conversation I had with Mary, and I associated this
young man with the foreign student she had discussed with me, because
Mary said they were supporting this foreign student, and the young black
man I met outside the Ayers’ home said he had come to Glen Ellyn to
thank the Ayers in person for helping him with his education.”
During the 2008 presidential campaign, Hulton observed several news
reports detailing the relationship between Obama and Bill Ayers, and he
recalled the encounter with the young man in front of Tom and Mary
Ayers’ home.
“The facial and physical characteristics, as well as candidate Obama’s
voice, matched that of the young black male I met in front of the Ayers’
home,” Hulton says in the affidavit he signed Nov. 12, 2011, for
Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse investigation.
“I am positive that the black male I spoke with in front of the Ayers’ house that day was indeed a young Barack Obama.”
Hulton distinctly recalls that the day he met Obama in front of the
Ayers’ residence was a warm, sunny day and that Obama wasn’t wearing a
jacket.
Marxist
Hulton recalls that he had one conversation with Tom Ayers, who was
retired as CEO and chairman of Commonwealth Edison, shortly after the
Ayers family moved into their home in Glen Ellyn.
“He asked me how I liked my job, and he started into what seemed to me a
Marxist viewpoint on what it is like for the working man, trying to
convince me that working people like me were exploited by their
employers,” Hulton remembers of the conversation.
“As an American citizen, I appreciated everything I had, and I was not
at war with people who had more than I had,” he says. “It surprised me
to hear somebody who had been president of Consolidated Edison talking
in these terms.”
Hulton says he got the feeling that Tom Ayers thought he knew more about the plight of the workingman than he did.
Summer 1989
A likely timeframe for Hulton’s alleged encounter with Obama is the
summer of 1989, when Obama was an intern at the Chicago law firm Sidley
Austin, after his first year at Harvard Law School.
Hulton says Obama mentioned to him taking the train. The Metra, a
commuter from downtown Chicago, stops at a Glen Ellyn station a little
more than a mile from the Ayers’ residence.
Michelle Robinson, Obama’s wife-to-be, was the attorney at the firm assigned to mentor Obama in the summer of 1989.
Bill Ayers’ wife, Bernardine Dohrn, also had worked as a paralegal at
Sidley Austin, from 1984 through 1988. Dohrn’s 1960s radical activities
as a self-described “revolutionary communist” landed her on the FBI’s
list of 10 most wanted fugitives, and because of her felony conviction,
she was not allowed to take the Illinois bar exam.
Widely speculated in Chicago is that Dohrn got the job at Sidley Austin
through the influence of her father-in-law, Thomas Ayers, who was one of
the law firm’s biggest clients.
Michelle Obama started at the firm in the summer of 1988 and remained there until 1991.
Hulton recalls meeting Dohrn at the home of her in-laws, although his
encounters with her were limited to having Dohrn sign for mail addressed
to her.
First reported in 2009
Hulton’s account of meeting Obama in suburban Chicago was first reported
by California lawyer and political scientist Stephen Diamond in
September 2009.
Writing on his blog, Diamond reported that he had interviewed Hulton at length and considered his account credible.
“The statement by Hulton is the first eyewitness account of a possible
relationship between Obama and Tom Ayers and the first that dates his
relationship with the Ayers family to the mid-1980s,” Diamond wrote.
As early as Oct. 13, 2008, prior to the November 2008 presidential
election, Diamond had reported that Obama’s relationship with the Ayers
family dated back to 1988. At that time, Obama, as head of the
Developing Communities Project, joined the Alliance for Better Chicago
Schools, the ABCs Coalition. The lobbying alliance aimed to push through
Chicago public schools the creation of “Local School Councils,” or
LSCs, to oversee teachers and administrators.
“The proposal was very controversial, and groups like Operation PUSH
headed by Jesse Jackson did not support it, because many teachers were
black – it was one of the first stable middle class careers a black
person, and black women in particular, could aspire to in Chicago,”
Diamond wrote.
Tom Ayers and Bill Ayers were strong supporters of the LSCs, however,
according to Diamond, and Chicago United, a group founded by Tom Ayers,
joined ABCs too. Bill Ayers became chairman of ABCs.
Knew Ayers’ brother
Hulton was in the same class as Tim Ayers, Bill Ayers’ brother, at
Glenbard High School in Glen Ellyn. Although he did not know Bill Ayers,
Hulton thought he might have met him at the parents’ home once or
twice, but he could not say for certain.
Hulton attended Glenbard, now known as Glenbard West, for four years,
but did not have enough credits to graduate. He later earned a GED while
in military service. Taking leave from the USPS when he was drafted
into the U.S. Army in 1965, Hulton returned to work as a mailman
following his honorable discharge in 1967.
While in the Army, he was assigned to a Pershing Ballistics Missile unit
in Germany. Although the Vietnam War was being fought at the time, he
was never assigned to Vietnam.
Jerome Corsi – March 20, 2012 – posted at LibertyNewsOnline
Source – WorldNetDaily
digg
muti
del.icio.us
google
reddit
facebook
Article source: http://www.knowthelies.com/node/7190
The United Nations and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton are moving forward with their plan to confiscate your guns!
The United States joined 152 other countries in support of the Arms
Trade Treaty Resolution, which establishes the dates for the 2012 UN
conference intended to attack American sovereignty by stripping
Americans of the right to keep and bear arms.
Working groups of anti-gun countries will begin scripting language for
the conference this year, creating a blueprint for other countries when
they meet at the full conference.
The stakes couldn’t be higher.
Former United Nation’s ambassador John Bolton has cautioned gun owners
about the Arms Trade Treaty and says the UN “is trying to act as though
this is really just a treaty about international arms trade between
nation states, but there’s no doubt that the real agenda here is
domestic firearms control.”
Establishing the dates for the Arms Trade Treaty Conference is just the
first step toward their plans for total gun confiscation.
The worldwide gun control mob will ensure the passage of an egregious, anti-gun treat…
… and that’s where Secretary of State Hillary Clinton steps in!
Once the UN Gun Ban is passed by the General Assembly of the United
Nations it must be ratified by each nation, including the United States.
As an arch enemy of gun owners, Clinton has pledged to push the U.S.
Senate to ratify the treaty. She will push for passage of this
outrageous treaty designed to register, ban and CONFISCATE firearms
owned by private citizens like YOU.
That’s why it’s vital you sign the special petition I’ve made up for
your signature that DEMANDS your U.S. Senators vote AGAINST ratification
of the UN’s “Small Arms Treaty.”
So far, the gun-grabbers have successfully kept the exact wording of their new scheme under wraps.
But looking at previous versions of the UN “Small Arms Treaty,” you and I can get a good idea of what’s likely in the works.
Don’t let any of the “experts” lull you to sleep by saying “Oh, we have
it handled” or “Until you know exactly what’s in the treaty you can’t
fight against it.”
Judging by Ambassador Bolton’s comments — who certainly knows what to
expect from the American-freedom-hating international crowd that infests
the U.N. — we are certain the treaty’s going to address the private
ownership of firearms.
If passed by the UN and ratified by the U.S. Senate (which is where we
must ultimately make our stand), the UN “Small Arms Treaty” would almost
certainly FORCE national governments to:
*** Enact tougher licensing requirements, making law-abiding citizens
cut through even more bureaucratic red tape just to own a firearm
legally;*** CONFISCATE and DESTROY ALL “unauthorized” civilian firearms (all firearms owned by the government are excluded, of course);
*** BAN the trade, sale and private ownership of ALL semi-automatic weapons;
*** Create an INTERNATIONAL gun registry, setting the stage for
full-scale gun CONFISCATION. So please click here to sign the petition
to your U.S. Senators before it’s too late!
You see, this is NOT a fight we can afford to lose.
Here’s what you can do to help the National Association for Gun Rights fight Hillary Clinton and her United Nations cronies:
Forward this e-mail to your friends and relatives who share your concern
for American sovereignty and protecting our right to keep and bear
arms.
Please consider making a generous contribution to the National
Association for Gun Rights to help us fight Hillary Clinton and the
United Nations “Small Arms Treaty.” Without your help and support, the
National Association for Gun Rights cannot defeat this measure.
March 15, 2012 -posted at LibertyNewsOnline
Source – NationalAssociationOfGunRights
digg
muti
del.icio.us
google
reddit
facebook
Article source: http://www.knowthelies.com/node/7191

In a story that should be getting lots of attention, American Banker has released an excellent and disturbing exposé
of J.P. Morgan Chase’s credit card services division, relying on
multiple current and former Chase employees. One of them, Linda Almonte,
is a whistleblower whom I’ve known since last September; I’m working on
a recount of her story for my next book. ~ Matt Taibbi
One
of the things we were promised by the lawmakers who passed the
Dodd-Frank reform bill a few years back is that this would be a new era
for whistleblowers who come forward to tell the world about problems in
our financial infrastructure. This story now looms as a test case for
that proposition.
American Banker reporter Jeff Horwitz did an
outstanding job in this story detailing the sweeping irregularities
in-house at Chase, but his very thoroughness means the news may have
ramifications for Linda, which is why I’m urging people to pay attention
to this story in the upcoming weeks.
The
Cliff’s Notes version of the story goes something like this: Late in
2009, Chase’s credit card services division sold a parcel of nearly $200
million worth of credit card judgments to a debt collector at a
discount.
This common practice in the credit-card industry is a little
like a bookie selling the outstanding debts of his delinquent gamblers
to a leg-breaker for 25 cents on the dollar.
If the leg-breaker gets
half the delinquents to pay, the deal works out for both sides — the
bookie gets 25 percent of money he wasn’t going to collect, and the
leg-breaker makes a 100 percent profit.
In the
case of credit cards, of course, you’re selling the debts to collection
agents, not leg-breakers, but aside from that unpleasantly minor
distinction the process is the same.
The most valuable kinds of sales in
this world are sales of credit card judgments, in other words accounts
in which the debtor has already been successfully brought to court.
That, ostensibly, is what this bloc of accounts Chase sold in 2009
involved.
Almonte
came to Chase in the summer of 2009 as a mid-level executive in the
credit card services division’s offices in San Antonio, and was quickly
put in charge of preparing the documentation for this enormous sale of
credit card judgments.
When Chase regional offices from places like
southern California and Illinois began sending in the papers for these
“judgments,” Almonte very soon found out that something was seriously
wrong. From Horwitz’s piece:
Nearly half of the files [Linda's] team sampled were missing proofs of judgment or other essential information, she wrote to colleagues.
Even more worrisome, she alleged in her wrongful-termination suit,
nearly a quarter of the files misstated how much the borrower owed.In the “vast majority” of those instances, the actual debt was “lower that what Chase was representing,” her suit stated.
Linda
subsequently found an enormous range of errors. Some judgments, she told
me, were not judgments at all. In some cases, she said, Chase actually
owed the customer money.
When she
brought these concerns to her superiors, what do you think their
response was? They told her and others to shut up and just sell the
stuff anyway. Her boss, Jason Lazinbat, allegedly told her “she had
better go along with the plan to sell the misrepresented asset.”
Think of
the consequences of this: because Chase was so anxious to make money
off this debt sale, countless credit card borrowers would now have
collection agents chasing them for money they did not owe.
The
debt-buyer, too, was victimized by being sold accounts it could not
collect on. It is almost impossible to estimate how many man-hours of
pointless court proceedings would be lost because of this decision.
Anyway,
when Linda refused to go along with the sale, she was fired. This was in
November of 2009.
She then went through a post-firing odyssey that is
an epic tale in itself: her many attempts to get any of the major bank
regulators interested in this case were disturbingly fruitless for a
long time (although the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is
apparently looking into it now), and she struggled to find work in the
industry.
She has
been repeatedly harassed and has gone through all sorts of personal
hardship as a result of this incident. She filed a whistleblower claim
with the SEC as part of the new whistleblower program created by
Dodd-Frank, but so far there’s been no progress there.
When I
met Linda last year, my first reaction to her story was that I was
skeptical. The tale she told went far beyond the bank knowingly selling
millions of dollars worth of errors into the financial system. She also
recounted, firsthand, the bank’s elaborate robosigning operation, which
Horvitz, talking to other Chase employees, also discussed:
“We did
not verify a single one” of the affidavits attesting to the amounts
Chase was seeking to collect, says Howard Hardin, who oversaw a team
handling tens of thousands of Chase debt files in San Antonio. “We were
told [by superiors] ‘We’re in a hurry. Go ahead and sign them.’”
And
there were other stories…suffice to say that the picture Linda painted
of life inside Chase reminded me a little of Upton Sinclair’s The Jungle:
they were putting just about everything into those sausages.
When I was
writing it all up for my book I went through a period where I was
waking up nights, seized with the urge to close every credit account I
had – her story makes you think that most credit card companies are
essentially indistinguishable from giant identity theft operations.
Again,
though, when I first heard the story, I was skeptical – until I found
other people in the company who verified Almonte’s account, all the way
down the line.
Horvitz, too, found numerous employees in Chase’s credit
card services division who confirmed the story of the company knowingly
selling a mountain of errors into the market, and manufacturing
robo-signed documents to the tune of thousands per week.
The
financial crash wouldn’t have happened if even a slim plurality of
financial executives had done what Linda Almonte did, i.e. simply refuse
to sign off on a bogus transaction.
If companies had merely upheld
their own stated policies and stayed within the ballpark of the law,
none of these messes could have accumulated: fraudulent mortgages
wouldn’t have been sold, families wouldn’t have been foreclosed upon
based on robo-signed documentation, investors wouldn’t have been duped
into buying huge packets of “misrepresented assets.”
Most
executives didn’t refuse to go along, precisely because powerful
companies make it so hard on people who come forward. Almonte, after
being fired, entered into a modest settlement with Chase that prohibited
her from coming forward publicly.
At the time she entered into the
settlement she was in an extremely desperate state, and she made a bad
decision, taking a very bad deal.
Still, like Jeffery Wygand, the tobacco scientist from the movie The Insider,
she was sitting on top of a story that, morally speaking, should not
ever be protected by a confidentiality agreement.
The subsequent
lack of regulatory action eventually moved her to speak out to people
like Horvitz and me. Of course, now that her story is out there in
public, the concern is that the bank will move swiftly to take her to
court.
This
person does not have any money, so an action by Chase at this point
would be purely punitive, to send a message to future whistleblowers.
They’ll be more likely to do it if they think no one is paying
attention. I’ll keep you posted on that score.
In the meantime, please check out Horvitz’s piece. It should give everyone who has a credit card pause.
Matt Taibbi – March 16, 2012 – posted at InformationClearingHouse
Source – Rolling Stone
digg
muti
del.icio.us
google
reddit
facebook
Article source: http://www.knowthelies.com/node/7186






